As a vehicle owner certain things are expected of us, pay your insurance, drive safely and respect the rules of the road. When mistakes happen your insurance company should be there to support you, for instance in an accident or if your vehicle is stolen.

I’ve only had one major dealing with automobile insurance over my 20+ years of driving, after sliding on ice last year and wreaking my vehicle. My overall experience was not terrible, but I had to spend weeks researching the actual value to receive acceptable payment for the loss of my car. What I do not understand is how ICBC can be a monopolistic company in BC for starters, and how they can regularly low-ball people’s claims. How is ethical for them to do this to people time and again?

Fortunately for me my incident occurred during a particularly bad time during the pandemic, so while locked down I had plenty of time to properly research my vehicle and send a rather lengthy document with several examples proving why ICBC was incorrect in their valuation of my vehicle. As a result, I received nearly double the payout, enough to purchase a similar vehicle as is the point of insurance. Had I not taken the time to prove my case, there is no way I would have been able to find a suitable replacement.

I don’t believe it is ethical of insurance companies to force their customers to fight for what is owed them based on what should be right. Furthermore, how is it ICBC can operate in this province without any competitors? Surely, one or two additional agencies in competition would both encourage ICBC to operate more ethically and to become more competitive in the market. During my case it came to the point of take it or leave it, forcing me to forgo thousands of dollars I felt were justified by my research into the actual valuation of my vehicle. How is that ethical of a company in contract with a customer?

My case is rather benign, I can only imagine the battle for life insurance valued at 20x or more the value of a meagre vehicle…